Our 24/7 cancer helpline provides information and answers for people dealing with cancer. We can connect you with trained cancer information specialists who will answer questions about a cancer diagnosis and provide guidance and a compassionate ear.
Chat live online
Select the Live Chat button at the bottom of the page
Our highly trained specialists are available 24/7 via phone and on weekdays can assist through online chat. We connect patients, caregivers, and family members with essential services and resources at every step of their cancer journey. Ask us how you can get involved and support the fight against cancer. Some of the topics we can assist with include:
- Referrals to patient-related programs or resources
- Donations, website, or event-related assistance
- Tobacco-related topics
- Volunteer opportunities
- Cancer Information
For medical questions, we encourage you to review our information with your doctor.
- Triggering Signals of BRCA1 Breast Cancer (K Kessenbrock)
- Testing Diverse Groups Finds New Breast Cancer Genes (L Teras)
- Black Women & Genetic Testing (J Palmer)
- Women 65+ & Genetic Tests for Breast Cancer Risk (L Teras)
- High-Risk Genes and Screening (A Patel)
- New Risk Calculation May Affect Breast Cancer Screening (L Teras)
- Black Men and Breast Cancer (H Sung)
- Platelets May Help Breast Cancer Spread (E Battinelli)
- Natural Killer Cells & TNBC (R. Chakrabarti)
- Improving Chemotherapy (O Sahin)
- Combo Treatment for TNBC (K Varley)
- Treatments Attack Cell Division (A Holland)
- ER+ Treatment in Mice (P Kenny)
- Blood DNA Monitors Metastasis Treatment (H P Ji)
- PTK6 Gene as Treatment Target (H Irie)
- Time-Lapse Cell Movies (S Spencer)
- 3D Mini Breast Tumors May Help ID New Cancer Treatments
- AI Tool Improves Breast Cancer Prognosis Accuracy
- Exercise & Sitting Time (E. Rees-Punia)
- Cancer Risk Factors in LGBTQ Populations (B. Charlton)
- CPS-3 Disparities Studies
- Cancer Disparities in the US (F. Islami)
- Housing Assistance and Mammograms (H Lee)
- Clinical Trial Treatment Cost App (L Hamel)
- Podcasts, TheoryLab
- Patients Health Insurance Tool (M. Politi)
- Breast Cancer Treatment in Ethiopia (A. Jemal)
- Better Survival Requires Better Insurance (J Zhao)
- Medicaid Eligibility Limits (J Zhao)
- New Treatment for Neuroblastoma (A Heczey)
- Oncogenic Fusions AML (S Meshinchi)
- Genetic Risks (L Teras)
- New Medulloblastoma Drugs (J Rodriguez-Blanco)
- Potential New Hope for MLL (J Grembecka)
- Increase in Brain Tumor Diagnosis (K Miller)
- Longer Life Expectancy for Survivors (J Yeh)
- Potential Target for New Osteosarcoma Drugs (C Benavente)
- At-Home Chemo for Children with HR ALL (L Ranney)
- Childhood Cancer Research Landscape Report
- Tumor-Infiltrating Neutrophils (R. Sumagin)
- New Epigenetic Target (K Rai)
- Extra Chromosomes (Aneuploidy) Effect on Cancer (J. Sheltzer)
- Discovery of a New Biomarker Is the First Step to New Treatment (C. Maher)
- Designer Virus Targets and Kills CRC Cells in Mice (S. Warner)
- Tiny Sensor in Mice May Find Cancer That's Trying to Spread (L. Hao)
- Targeting a Protein “Turned on” by Mistake (N. Gao)
- Spatial Map Intestines (J Hickey)
- CRC Treatment Podcasts
- Keto Molecule & Colorectal Cancer (M Levy)
- Availability of Healthy Food (L Tussing-Humphreys)
- 45 Min/Day of Physical Activity (A Minihan)
- Fewer than 10K Steps/Day (A Patel)
- Yogurt & Cheese & ER- Breast Cancer (M McCullough)
- Stage 2 Clinical Trials for New Endometrial Cancer Drug (V Bae-Jump)
- Hard-to-Starve Pancreatic Cancer Cells (N Kalaany)
- Coffee Risks for Colorectal Cancer (C Um)
- Food Parasite & Brain Cancer Risk (J Hodge)
- Exercise & Quality of Life in Older Survivors (E Rees-Punia)
- 21 Metabolites Linked with Breast Cancer (Y Wang)
- Replacing Sitting May Affect Weight (E Rees-Punia)
- CPS-3 Researchers Ask What People Eat and Check Urine Samples (Y Wang)
- Video Games Motivate Exercise? (E. Lyons)
- Food Choices and Colon Cancer Risk (P. Chandler)
- Race, Exercise & Breast Cancer (C. Dallal)
- Diet with Colorectal Cancer (M. Guinter)
- Biomarkers May Improve Prediction (Y Wang)
- Kickstart NSCLCs Clinical Trials (L. Eichner)
- Mapping Mitochondria's “Dance” (D. Shackleford)
- E-Cig Use Ages 18 to 29 (P. Bandi)
- Stopping Smoking Earlier in Life (F Islami)
- Most with Lung Cancer Smoked (A Jemal)
- Furthering Lung Cancer Screening & Equity (S Fedewa)
- Mouse Lung Organoids for Research (C Kim)
- Quality of Life for Lung Cancer Survivors (J Temel)
- Precision Therapies for NSCLC (P Jänne)
- Cancer Deaths from Smoking (F Islami)
- Lung Cancer Surgery Disparities (A Jemal)
- BRG1-Deficient Lung Cancers (C Kim)
- Yoga for Couples with Lung Cancer (K Milbury)
- Metabolic Differences as New Drug Targets (A Marcus)
- CPS-II & CPS-3 Inform About Risks of Ovarian Cancer
- Machine Learning & Glowing Nanosensors (D Heller)
- Ovarian Cancer May Start in Fallopian Tube Cells (K Lawrenson)
- New Gene Linked with Deadliest Type (C Han)
- Gene-Testing Tools May Personalize Care (A Sood)
- Chromosome-Hoarding Ovarian Cancer Cells & Treatment (J Sheltzer)
- Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery for Metastases (X Lu)
- Turning Off 2 Proteins to Slow HGSC (P Kreeger)
- Targeted Light Therapy in Mice (M Bai)
- Nanoparticles, CAR T, and CRISPR (M Stephan)
- Endometriosis & Ovarian Cancer in Mice (M Wilson)
- Ovarian Cancer Special Section
- UV Exposure, Melanoma, & Dark Skin Types (A. Adamson)
- Melanoma and Lipid Droplets (R. White)
- Zebrafish and Acral Melanoma (R. White)
- T-Cell Lymphoma and PD1 (J. Choi)
- New Drug Destroys Cancer-Causing Protein (C. Crews)
- Virus & Merkel Cell Skin Cancer (R. Wang)
- Non-Genetic Drug Resistance (S. Spencer)
- Hijacking the Body's Sugar (R. Wang)
- Telling about High Risk (P. Kanetsky)
- Brain Metastasis and Alzheimer’s (E. Hernando)
- Exhausted Melanoma "Killer" Cells (W. Cui)
Adults May Benefit from Fewer than 10K Steps a Day
Study: Up to age 59, the risk of dying decreases as the number of steps increase, up to 8K-10K steps/day. After age 60, benefits level off at 6K-8K steps/day.
The Challenge
10,000. That’s the number of steps to take each day that’s widely promoted as the best number for overall health. Yet there’s little scientific evidence to support that recommendation.
In fact, it’s thought that the number started in Japan, 1965, with a marketing campaign for a pedometer called Manpo-kei, which translates to “10,000 steps meter.”
Of course, there’s plenty of scientific evidence that physical activity can reduce your chances of developing and dying from heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and several types of cancer.
And monitoring the number of steps taken each day has continually become easier and more and more trendy with the use of fitness trackers and mobile devices. So, it could be very helpful to learn through science the best number of steps to take, and at what speed, based on your age and sex.
The Research
The Steps for Health Collaborative is an international consortium formed to determine the link between health outcomes and the number of steps taken a day and the pace. Two of its members are from the American Cancer Society (ACS): Senior Vice President of Population Science, Alpa Patel, PhD, and Senior Principal Scientist of Epidemiology and Behavioral Research, Erika Rees-Punia, PhD, MPH.
Right now there are no public health guidelines that recommend the number of steps to take a day to gain health benefits. The World Health Organization, The US Physical Activity Guidelines, and the American Cancer Society guidelines all focus on being physically active at a moderate-to-vigorous intensity for at least 150 minutes a week. We haven’t had the scientific evidence to recommend the number of steps required each day to reap health benefits. In this study, we found consistent associations across 15 studies from various countries, age ranges, and step-monitoring devices, which gives us more confidence that there’s a clear link between taking more steps and having a lower risk of dying from all causes. This paper in itself cannot set a number of steps to take a day, but we’re hoping that this study will provide some useful evidence when future public health guidelines are developed.”
Amanda Paluch, PhD
University of Massachusetts at Amherst and the American Cancer Society
ACS Grantee
In a study published in Lancet Public Health, led by Amanda E. Paluch, PhD, at University of Massachusetts in Amherst, the consortium reported findings based on the analysis of 15 studies from Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America, which included 47,471 adults and 3,013 deaths. This included data from ACS's own CPS-3 cohort. They were looking for the best range of steps to take a day associated with a reduced risk of dying from all causes.
To strengthen the reliability of their findings, the researchers’ applied a standardized method for data across all the studies.
They found:
- Compared with adults who take the lowest number of steps—about 3,500 steps/day—adults taking the most steps—about 6,000 to 10,000 steps/day—have a 40% to 53% lower risk of dying from all causes.
- The least active people have the biggest decrease in their risk of death, even when they only moderately increase their number of steps—such as adding 1,000 to 2,000 more a day over time. (So making those early efforts has a big payoff for your health!)
- Men and women up to age 59 who take more steps a day increasingly lower the risk of dying from all causes—up to about 8,000 to 10,000 steps/day. But taking more isn’t necessarily bad. Researchers did not find that taking more than 10,000 steps a day increased the risk of dying.
- People ages 60 and older who take more steps—up to 6,000 to 8,000 steps /day—have a lower risk of dying from all causes.
- Evidence was inconsistent about how the speed or pace of walking affects the risk of dying.
The authors said future studies should promote and monitor steps in populations who have a higher risk of dying because of a chronic disease, including cancer, having low socioeconomic status, or being a part of a higher-risk race/ethnicity group.
Why It Matters
The findings of the Steps for Health Collaboration suggest health benefits, particularly for older adults, can be seen at lower number of steps than the popularized goal of 10,000 steps a day. Their results can be used to help inform updated guidelines for the public health promotion of physical activity.