Our 24/7 cancer helpline provides information and answers for people dealing with cancer. We can connect you with trained cancer information specialists who will answer questions about a cancer diagnosis and provide guidance and a compassionate ear.
Chat live online
Select the Live Chat button at the bottom of the page
Our highly trained specialists are available 24/7 via phone and on weekdays can assist through online chat. We connect patients, caregivers, and family members with essential services and resources at every step of their cancer journey. Ask us how you can get involved and support the fight against cancer. Some of the topics we can assist with include:
- Referrals to patient-related programs or resources
- Donations, website, or event-related assistance
- Tobacco-related topics
- Volunteer opportunities
- Cancer Information
For medical questions, we encourage you to review our information with your doctor.
- Triggering Signals of BRCA1 Breast Cancer (K Kessenbrock)
- Testing Diverse Groups Finds New Breast Cancer Genes (L Teras)
- Black Women & Genetic Testing (J Palmer)
- Women 65+ & Genetic Tests for Breast Cancer Risk (L Teras)
- High-Risk Genes and Screening (A Patel)
- New Risk Calculation May Affect Breast Cancer Screening (L Teras)
- Black Men and Breast Cancer (H Sung)
- Platelets May Help Breast Cancer Spread (E Battinelli)
- Natural Killer Cells & TNBC (R. Chakrabarti)
- Improving Chemotherapy (O Sahin)
- Combo Treatment for TNBC (K Varley)
- Treatments Attack Cell Division (A Holland)
- ER+ Treatment in Mice (P Kenny)
- Blood DNA Monitors Metastasis Treatment (H P Ji)
- PTK6 Gene as Treatment Target (H Irie)
- Time-Lapse Cell Movies (S Spencer)
- 3D Mini Breast Tumors May Help ID New Cancer Treatments
- AI Tool Improves Breast Cancer Prognosis Accuracy
- Exercise & Sitting Time (E. Rees-Punia)
- Cancer Risk Factors in LGBTQ Populations (B. Charlton)
- CPS-3 Disparities Studies
- Cancer Disparities in the US (F. Islami)
- Housing Assistance and Mammograms (H Lee)
- Clinical Trial Treatment Cost App (L Hamel)
- Podcasts, TheoryLab
- Patients Health Insurance Tool (M. Politi)
- Breast Cancer Treatment in Ethiopia (A. Jemal)
- Better Survival Requires Better Insurance (J Zhao)
- Medicaid Eligibility Limits (J Zhao)
- New Treatment for Neuroblastoma (A Heczey)
- Oncogenic Fusions AML (S Meshinchi)
- Genetic Risks (L Teras)
- New Medulloblastoma Drugs (J Rodriguez-Blanco)
- Potential New Hope for MLL (J Grembecka)
- Increase in Brain Tumor Diagnosis (K Miller)
- Longer Life Expectancy for Survivors (J Yeh)
- Potential Target for New Osteosarcoma Drugs (C Benavente)
- At-Home Chemo for Children with HR ALL (L Ranney)
- Childhood Cancer Research Landscape Report
- Tumor-Infiltrating Neutrophils (R. Sumagin)
- New Epigenetic Target (K Rai)
- Extra Chromosomes (Aneuploidy) Effect on Cancer (J. Sheltzer)
- Discovery of a New Biomarker Is the First Step to New Treatment (C. Maher)
- Designer Virus Targets and Kills CRC Cells in Mice (S. Warner)
- Tiny Sensor in Mice May Find Cancer That's Trying to Spread (L. Hao)
- Targeting a Protein “Turned on” by Mistake (N. Gao)
- Spatial Map Intestines (J Hickey)
- CRC Treatment Podcasts
- Keto Molecule & Colorectal Cancer (M Levy)
- Availability of Healthy Food (L Tussing-Humphreys)
- 45 Min/Day of Physical Activity (A Minihan)
- Fewer than 10K Steps/Day (A Patel)
- Yogurt & Cheese & ER- Breast Cancer (M McCullough)
- Stage 2 Clinical Trials for New Endometrial Cancer Drug (V Bae-Jump)
- Hard-to-Starve Pancreatic Cancer Cells (N Kalaany)
- Coffee Risks for Colorectal Cancer (C Um)
- Food Parasite & Brain Cancer Risk (J Hodge)
- Exercise & Quality of Life in Older Survivors (E Rees-Punia)
- 21 Metabolites Linked with Breast Cancer (Y Wang)
- Replacing Sitting May Affect Weight (E Rees-Punia)
- CPS-3 Researchers Ask What People Eat and Check Urine Samples (Y Wang)
- Video Games Motivate Exercise? (E. Lyons)
- Food Choices and Colon Cancer Risk (P. Chandler)
- Race, Exercise & Breast Cancer (C. Dallal)
- Diet with Colorectal Cancer (M. Guinter)
- Biomarkers May Improve Prediction (Y Wang)
- Kickstart NSCLCs Clinical Trials (L. Eichner)
- Mapping Mitochondria's “Dance” (D. Shackleford)
- E-Cig Use Ages 18 to 29 (P. Bandi)
- Stopping Smoking Earlier in Life (F Islami)
- Most with Lung Cancer Smoked (A Jemal)
- Furthering Lung Cancer Screening & Equity (S Fedewa)
- Mouse Lung Organoids for Research (C Kim)
- Quality of Life for Lung Cancer Survivors (J Temel)
- Precision Therapies for NSCLC (P Jänne)
- Cancer Deaths from Smoking (F Islami)
- Lung Cancer Surgery Disparities (A Jemal)
- BRG1-Deficient Lung Cancers (C Kim)
- Yoga for Couples with Lung Cancer (K Milbury)
- Metabolic Differences as New Drug Targets (A Marcus)
- CPS-II & CPS-3 Inform About Risks of Ovarian Cancer
- Machine Learning & Glowing Nanosensors (D Heller)
- Ovarian Cancer May Start in Fallopian Tube Cells (K Lawrenson)
- New Gene Linked with Deadliest Type (C Han)
- Gene-Testing Tools May Personalize Care (A Sood)
- Chromosome-Hoarding Ovarian Cancer Cells & Treatment (J Sheltzer)
- Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery for Metastases (X Lu)
- Turning Off 2 Proteins to Slow HGSC (P Kreeger)
- Targeted Light Therapy in Mice (M Bai)
- Nanoparticles, CAR T, and CRISPR (M Stephan)
- Endometriosis & Ovarian Cancer in Mice (M Wilson)
- Ovarian Cancer Special Section
- UV Exposure, Melanoma, & Dark Skin Types (A. Adamson)
- Melanoma and Lipid Droplets (R. White)
- Zebrafish and Acral Melanoma (R. White)
- T-Cell Lymphoma and PD1 (J. Choi)
- New Drug Destroys Cancer-Causing Protein (C. Crews)
- Virus & Merkel Cell Skin Cancer (R. Wang)
- Non-Genetic Drug Resistance (S. Spencer)
- Hijacking the Body's Sugar (R. Wang)
- Telling about High Risk (P. Kanetsky)
- Brain Metastasis and Alzheimer’s (E. Hernando)
- Exhausted Melanoma "Killer" Cells (W. Cui)
Women 65+ May Benefit from Genetic Tests for Breast Cancer Risk
For the first time, researchers estimate the prevalence of pathogenic variants of breast cancer predisposition genes beyond BRCA1/2 in older women.
The Challenge
Current guidelines do not recommend genetic counseling and testing for most women over age 65 because they’re assumed to have a small chance of having a pathogenic variant in one of the high-penetrance genes (also known as high-risk genes)—BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2.
Widely used guidelines developed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) also don’t recommend hereditary cancer testing (genetic testing) or yearly breast cancer screening MRIs for women older than age 65. One of the reasons is because few studies have specifically looked at predisposition genes in women over age 65 – either those who have been diagnosed with breast cancer, or those who haven’t.
For women older than 65, better estimates of the remaining lifetime risk of breast cancer linked with having a pathogenic variant in a predisposition gene are needed. (See blue box below for an overview of basic terms about inheriting cancer risks.) Knowing more about breast cancer risk can help a woman and her doctors make informed decisions about:
- The best ways to manage her care based on what personal risk of developing breast cancer she may have.
- The treatment most likely to be successful if she develops breast cancer.
- How and when to talk with family members about the possibility of inherited risks for breast cancer
The Research
The United States-based Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) consortium conducted the largest study to date of women in the United States diagnosed with breast cancer after age 65.
Several American Cancer Society (ACS) epidemiologists participated in the study, including Lauren R. Teras, PhD, Alpa V. Patel, PhD, and James M. Hodge, MPH. Some of the many other contributors included ACS grantee Julie Palmer, PhD, and former ACS grantees Jeffrey N. Weitzel, MD, and Fergus Couch, PhD, who was the study’s senior author.
It was previously believed that women diagnosed with breast cancer after age 65 were unlikely to have been born with any high-risk breast cancer mutations. This study shows that some women older than 65, such as those diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer, are still likely to have genetic mutations and should be offered genetic counseling and testing.”
Lauren Teras, PhD
Senior Scientific Director, Epidemiology Research
Population Science, American Cancer Society
They reviewed data from about 27,000 women over age 65, with about half having a diagnosis of breast cancer. Data came from epidemiologic studies that included the ACS Cancer Prevention Studies, CPS-II and CPS-3.
The consortium published their findings from this study, showing that:
- Women older than age 65 who hadestrogen-receptor negative (ER-) breast cancer, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), had more pathogenic variants in the high-risk predisposition genes BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 than expected for this age group.
- Between 3% and 4.5% of women diagnosed with TNBC after age 60 had pathogenic variants in the high-risk predisposition genes.
- In contrast, after the age of 65, very few women without a family history or ER- breast cancer had these pathogenic genetic variants.
For women older than 65, this study provided evidence on:
Who should be considered for genetic counseling and testing. The authors state that this study provides evidence that women older than 65 should be considered for genetic counseling and testing when they have an ER- breast cancer (including TNBC) to help guide their care.
Who doesn’t need genetic counseling and testing. The authorsconfirm thatwomen older than age 65 who don’t have a family history or an ER- subtype of cancer would not benefit from genetic counseling and testing because they have a low likelihood of having a pathogenic variant in a high-penetrance gene, such as BRCA1 or BRCA2.
Who might benefit from enhanced breast cancer screening. Based on their findings, the authors also support enhanced breast cancer screening (such as MRI) for women over age 65 who have BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and possibly also those with CHEK2 and PALB2 mutations, whether or not they’ve been diagnosed with breast cancer. If a woman has been diagnosed with breast cancer, MRI screening could be used to look for second cancers or recurrence.
Family members with the same pathogenic variants may also benefit from enhanced breast cancer screening. These women and their family members may also want to talk with their doctors about the pros and cons of preventive surgery to remove their breasts and/or ovaries to prevent future cancers in those areas.
Why It Matters
The knowledge gained about the prevalence of pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes can be used to inform appropriate care, including guidelines for genetic counseling and testing as well as guidelines for breast cancer screening and other risk-management strategies for:
- Women older than 65 in the general population
- Women diagnosed with an ER- subtype after age 65
- Women diagnosed with TNBC at any age
- Family members of older women found to have pathogenic variants in high-risk predisposition genes.
Inheriting Cancer Risks: Some Basic Terms
Permanent changes in the DNA sequence of a gene are called gene mutations. Some scientists think that “gene variant” is a more accurate term because changes in DNA do not always lead to disease. Sometimes they’re used as synonyms.
Genetic variants can have a large or small effect on the likelihood of developing a particular disease. The term “pathogenic” refers to something that causes a disease. When genetic variants lead to disease, they’re called pathogenic variants, or pathogenic mutations.
Genes that are vulnerable to cancer-causing variants or changes are called cancer-predisposition genes. In some cases, a cancer-predisposition gene is inherited, or passed along from generation to generation. Several dozen cancer-predisposition genes have been identified, and about 5 to 10% of all cancers result directly from those that are inherited from a parent.
For example, BRCA1 and BRCA2 are inherited cancer predisposition genes. Mutations on these genes increase the risk for developing certain cancers.
The term penetrance is used to describe how many people carrying a mutation or cancer predisposition gene will eventually develop cancer. If everyone who inherits a mutation develops cancer, that mutation is said to have complete penetrance. If some people don’t, it’s incomplete or reduced penetrance. If most people with an inherited mutation develop cancer, that mutation has high penetrance. For example,pathogenic variations on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are high-penetrance gene mutations. Other gene mutations are in categories considered to be moderate- or low-penetrance.