Our 24/7 cancer helpline provides information and answers for people dealing with cancer. We can connect you with trained cancer information specialists who will answer questions about a cancer diagnosis and provide guidance and a compassionate ear.
Chat live online
Select the Live Chat button at the bottom of the page
Our highly trained specialists are available 24/7 via phone and on weekdays can assist through online chat. We connect patients, caregivers, and family members with essential services and resources at every step of their cancer journey. Ask us how you can get involved and support the fight against cancer. Some of the topics we can assist with include:
- Referrals to patient-related programs or resources
- Donations, website, or event-related assistance
- Tobacco-related topics
- Volunteer opportunities
- Cancer Information
For medical questions, we encourage you to review our information with your doctor.
- Triggering Signals of BRCA1 Breast Cancer (K Kessenbrock)
- Testing Diverse Groups Finds New Breast Cancer Genes (L Teras)
- Black Women & Genetic Testing (J Palmer)
- Women 65+ & Genetic Tests for Breast Cancer Risk (L Teras)
- High-Risk Genes and Screening (A Patel)
- New Risk Calculation May Affect Breast Cancer Screening (L Teras)
- Black Men and Breast Cancer (H Sung)
- Platelets May Help Breast Cancer Spread (E Battinelli)
- Natural Killer Cells & TNBC (R. Chakrabarti)
- Improving Chemotherapy (O Sahin)
- Combo Treatment for TNBC (K Varley)
- Treatments Attack Cell Division (A Holland)
- ER+ Treatment in Mice (P Kenny)
- Blood DNA Monitors Metastasis Treatment (H P Ji)
- PTK6 Gene as Treatment Target (H Irie)
- Time-Lapse Cell Movies (S Spencer)
- 3D Mini Breast Tumors May Help ID New Cancer Treatments
- AI Tool Improves Breast Cancer Prognosis Accuracy
- Exercise & Sitting Time (E. Rees-Punia)
- Cancer Risk Factors in LGBTQ Populations (B. Charlton)
- CPS-3 Disparities Studies
- Cancer Disparities in the US (F. Islami)
- Housing Assistance and Mammograms (H Lee)
- Clinical Trial Treatment Cost App (L Hamel)
- Podcasts, TheoryLab
- Patients Health Insurance Tool (M. Politi)
- Breast Cancer Treatment in Ethiopia (A. Jemal)
- Better Survival Requires Better Insurance (J Zhao)
- Medicaid Eligibility Limits (J Zhao)
- New Treatment for Neuroblastoma (A Heczey)
- Oncogenic Fusions AML (S Meshinchi)
- Genetic Risks (L Teras)
- New Medulloblastoma Drugs (J Rodriguez-Blanco)
- Potential New Hope for MLL (J Grembecka)
- Increase in Brain Tumor Diagnosis (K Miller)
- Longer Life Expectancy for Survivors (J Yeh)
- Potential Target for New Osteosarcoma Drugs (C Benavente)
- At-Home Chemo for Children with HR ALL (L Ranney)
- Childhood Cancer Research Landscape Report
- Tumor-Infiltrating Neutrophils (R. Sumagin)
- New Epigenetic Target (K Rai)
- Extra Chromosomes (Aneuploidy) Effect on Cancer (J. Sheltzer)
- Discovery of a New Biomarker Is the First Step to New Treatment (C. Maher)
- Designer Virus Targets and Kills CRC Cells in Mice (S. Warner)
- Tiny Sensor in Mice May Find Cancer That's Trying to Spread (L. Hao)
- Targeting a Protein “Turned on” by Mistake (N. Gao)
- Spatial Map Intestines (J Hickey)
- CRC Treatment Podcasts
- Keto Molecule & Colorectal Cancer (M Levy)
- Availability of Healthy Food (L Tussing-Humphreys)
- 45 Min/Day of Physical Activity (A Minihan)
- Fewer than 10K Steps/Day (A Patel)
- Yogurt & Cheese & ER- Breast Cancer (M McCullough)
- Stage 2 Clinical Trials for New Endometrial Cancer Drug (V Bae-Jump)
- Hard-to-Starve Pancreatic Cancer Cells (N Kalaany)
- Coffee Risks for Colorectal Cancer (C Um)
- Food Parasite & Brain Cancer Risk (J Hodge)
- Exercise & Quality of Life in Older Survivors (E Rees-Punia)
- 21 Metabolites Linked with Breast Cancer (Y Wang)
- Replacing Sitting May Affect Weight (E Rees-Punia)
- CPS-3 Researchers Ask What People Eat and Check Urine Samples (Y Wang)
- Video Games Motivate Exercise? (E. Lyons)
- Food Choices and Colon Cancer Risk (P. Chandler)
- Race, Exercise & Breast Cancer (C. Dallal)
- Diet with Colorectal Cancer (M. Guinter)
- Biomarkers May Improve Prediction (Y Wang)
- Kickstart NSCLCs Clinical Trials (L. Eichner)
- Mapping Mitochondria's “Dance” (D. Shackleford)
- E-Cig Use Ages 18 to 29 (P. Bandi)
- Stopping Smoking Earlier in Life (F Islami)
- Most with Lung Cancer Smoked (A Jemal)
- Furthering Lung Cancer Screening & Equity (S Fedewa)
- Mouse Lung Organoids for Research (C Kim)
- Quality of Life for Lung Cancer Survivors (J Temel)
- Precision Therapies for NSCLC (P Jänne)
- Cancer Deaths from Smoking (F Islami)
- Lung Cancer Surgery Disparities (A Jemal)
- BRG1-Deficient Lung Cancers (C Kim)
- Yoga for Couples with Lung Cancer (K Milbury)
- Metabolic Differences as New Drug Targets (A Marcus)
- CPS-II & CPS-3 Inform About Risks of Ovarian Cancer
- Machine Learning & Glowing Nanosensors (D Heller)
- Ovarian Cancer May Start in Fallopian Tube Cells (K Lawrenson)
- New Gene Linked with Deadliest Type (C Han)
- Gene-Testing Tools May Personalize Care (A Sood)
- Chromosome-Hoarding Ovarian Cancer Cells & Treatment (J Sheltzer)
- Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery for Metastases (X Lu)
- Turning Off 2 Proteins to Slow HGSC (P Kreeger)
- Targeted Light Therapy in Mice (M Bai)
- Nanoparticles, CAR T, and CRISPR (M Stephan)
- Endometriosis & Ovarian Cancer in Mice (M Wilson)
- Ovarian Cancer Special Section
- UV Exposure, Melanoma, & Dark Skin Types (A. Adamson)
- Melanoma and Lipid Droplets (R. White)
- Zebrafish and Acral Melanoma (R. White)
- T-Cell Lymphoma and PD1 (J. Choi)
- New Drug Destroys Cancer-Causing Protein (C. Crews)
- Virus & Merkel Cell Skin Cancer (R. Wang)
- Non-Genetic Drug Resistance (S. Spencer)
- Hijacking the Body's Sugar (R. Wang)
- Telling about High Risk (P. Kanetsky)
- Brain Metastasis and Alzheimer’s (E. Hernando)
- Exhausted Melanoma "Killer" Cells (W. Cui)
Study of High-Risk Genes May Inform Breast Cancer Screening
For the first time, researchers recently looked at the prevalence of known breast-cancer predisposition genes in a population that included women without cancer.
The Challenge
Not all types of cancer are hereditary, but certain types of breast cancer are caused by an inherited gene mutation. About 7 to 10% of women with breast cancer have a pathogenic variant in a cancer predisposition gene. (See blue box at bottom for lay-friendly explanations about inheriting cancer risks.)
These statistics are based on populations with a high risk for developing breast cancer, which includes women with more than one close female relative (mother, sister, daughter) with breast cancer or who was diagnosed with breast cancer before age 50.
But studies to learn about women with breast cancer who don’t have one of these characteristics have been limited in size. And there haven’t been many studies to estimate the prevalence and risk of breast cancer associated with breast cancer-predisposition genes in the general population.
More research on the prevalence of these genes in the general population could offer valuable knowledge about the causes of cancer and could improve the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer.
The Research
Several American Cancer Society researchers, including current staff Alpa Patel, PhD,James Hodge, PhD, and Brian Carter, MPH, along with grantees, contribute to the work of the United States-based Cancer Risk Estimates Related to Susceptibility (CARRIERS) consortium, which conducts population- and family-based studies of breast cancer.
Their studies are the first large studies to use data from general population studies, including the American Cancer Society’s Cancer Prevention Studies II (CPS-II) and 3 (CPS-3), rather than data from families.
The Cancer Prevention Studies have played a role in identifying or validating every known common genetic variant for breast, prostate, and pancreatic cancers. This was the first large study to look at the prevalence of breast-cancer predisposition genes in the general population.”
Alpa Patel, PhD
Senior Vice President, Population Science
American Cancer Society
The researchers recently published a study of the general population and previously identified breast-cancer predisposition genes. The researchers looked at studied data about 28 cancer predisposition genes among 32,2347 women with breast cancer and 32,544 women without breast cancer. Their goal was to learn how common, or prevalent, pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposition genes are in women with and without breast cancer.
Their results included finding pathogenic variants in:
- 12 established cancer predisposition genes in 5% of women with breast cancer and almost 2% without cancer.
- The genes BARD1, RAD51C, and RAD51D were only associated with an increased risk of developing estrogen receptor-negative (ER-) breast cancer.
- The genes BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 were linked with all breast cancers, but they were more strongly linked ER- breast cancers.
- The genes ATM, CDH1, and CHEK2 were associated with an increased risk of developing estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer.
- 16 breast cancer predisposition genes were not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer
Why It Matters
Currently, recommendations are not clear about which women with breast cancer should receive genetic counseling and testing and which genes to look for. There's increasing discussion about screening for pathogenic variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in women without breast cancer.
It’s important that women who have variants in these genes talk to their doctor about their cancer risk and the best screening plan for them. They may need to be screened more often or have different tests, such as 3D mammograms or MRIs.
The results from this study provide refined estimates about the prevalence of pathogenic variants among women with breast cancer and in the overall population, which adds to the base of evidence that helps to inform recommendations for women in the general population, including:
- Genetic testing. For instance, recommendations could become more solid and could broaden to include other genetic mutations.
- Cancer screening. For example, if a woman has one of more these mutations, she could be in the high-risk category. Current ACS screening recommendations for women at high risk include getting a breast MRI and mammogram every year, typically starting at age 30.
- Other risk-management strategies (like risk assessment and counseling) for women with pathogenic variants in cancer-predisposition genes.
Previous ACS researchers who participated in this study: Sue Gapstur, PhD, Mia Gaudet, PhD, and Eric Jacobs, PhD
Current and previous ACS research grantees who also participated in this study:Fergus J. Couch, PhD, (ACS Grant Term: 7/1/2004 to 6/30/2009), Julie R Palmer, ScD, (ACS grant term: 1/1/2018 to 12/31/2021), and Jeffrey N. Weitzel, MD, (ACS grant term: 1/1/2010 to 12/31/2013 and 7/1/2010 to 6/30/2016)
Inheriting Cancer Risks: Some Basic Terms
Permanent changes in the DNA sequence of a gene are called gene mutations. Some scientists think that “gene variant” is a more accurate term because changes in DNA do not always lead to disease. Sometimes they’re used as synonyms.
Genetic variants can have a large or small effect on the likelihood of developing a particular disease. The term “pathogenic” refers to something that causes a disease. When genetic variants lead to disease, they’re called pathogenic variants, or pathogenic mutations.
Genes that are vulnerable to cancer-causing variants or changes are called cancer-predisposition genes. In some cases, a cancer-predisposition gene is inherited, or passed along from generation to generation. Several dozen cancer-predisposition genes have been identified, and about 5 to 10% of all cancers result directly from those that are inherited from a parent.
For example, BRCA1 and BRCA2 are inherited cancer predisposition genes. Mutations on these genes increase the risk for developing certain cancers.
The type of gene changes that get passed from parents to a child are called “germline variations.” Since the BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are passed down by parents, they’re an example of what are considered germline pathogenic variations.
Peoplewho inherit certain changed genes that make them more likely to develop cancer are said to have a genetic predisposition or a genetic susceptibility to a cancer or certain types of cancer. Sometimes this is referred to as having a family cancer syndrome. But having this doesn’t mean that person will develop cancer. And if they do develop cancer, it may not be caused by the inherited genetic mutation.
The term penetrance is used to describe how many people carrying a mutation or cancer predisposition gene will eventually develop cancer. If everyone who inherits a mutation develops cancer, that mutation is said to have complete penetrance. If some people don’t, it’s incomplete or reduced penetrance. If most people with an inherited mutation develop cancer, that mutation has high penetrance. For example,pathogenic variations on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are high-penetrance gene mutations. Other gene mutations are in categories considered to be moderate- or low-penetrance.